Let's face it, chicks want dudes who GTL. (For those of you who are not familiar with GTL, it stands for Gym, Tanning, Laundry.) Chicks who deny that they want dudes who GTL are lying, straight up. These lying butt hookers are usually just trying to "make a statement." They want to seem cool like they don't need or want muscular or at least in shape people. Why am I so certain that these girls are lying butt hookers? It's simple... because they are girls. Girls always say or do the exact opposite of what they want. I will give a sort-of example to illustrate: A guy says to a girl at bar: "You are a whore." Ten minutes later the girl responds by giving the guy her phone number. That actually happened, I was a witness, and the worst part about this example is that it didn't totally shock me.
Let's be completely frank: chicks want dudes on top of them "doin work." (Unless they are the lesbian type.) Who wants Johnny Appleseed, or some other stick figure goin' to town on their action? Yeah... zactly... no one. I'm sorry skinny dudes, but you gotta get ripped to get a chick, then you gotta have a personality to keep her. Remember, they are pretty much all lying butt hookers. If they say they need a dude with personality, that means that they only bang dudes with muscles, and then date the ones with personalities (in that order, usually). It's like E=MC^2, but in this context, G+T+L. Let's analyze.
Pauly D, The Situation, Ronnie, Vinnie
Let's be completely frank: chicks want dudes on top of them "doin work." (Unless they are the lesbian type.) Who wants Johnny Appleseed, or some other stick figure goin' to town on their action? Yeah... zactly... no one. I'm sorry skinny dudes, but you gotta get ripped to get a chick, then you gotta have a personality to keep her. Remember, they are pretty much all lying butt hookers. If they say they need a dude with personality, that means that they only bang dudes with muscles, and then date the ones with personalities (in that order, usually). It's like E=MC^2, but in this context, G+T+L. Let's analyze.
GYM.
Now, it's simple, you get muscles when you go to the gym. You also lose fat. Who thinks fat is attractive? Not I, said the cat. An example will illustrate, and point out your hypocrisy:
Tell me with a straight face that you'd bang future
Einstein before you'd bang the "Situation."
TANNING.
See the above photo. Similar analysis applies. Nobody wants to bang someone who is slightly invisible when they take their shirt off. Blinded by the light.
LAUNDRY.
Laundry isn't limited to the narrow concept of having clean clothes. It necessarily encompasses the larger idea of being fashionable, at least slightly. So with that said, people who don't dress well, necessarily struggle, trust me. An example:
Probably affliction t-shirts with
jeans worth at least 100 bucks.
People wearing shizzy like this don't get laid:
Unattractive.
I forgot where I was going with this post, but it has something to do with girls being lying butt hookers. Oh yeah, I remember now. There have been studies showing that people of similar attractiveness end up dating or hooking up with one another because people of better attractiveness usually end up rejecting them. See generally Berscheid. Remember that song where the chorus goes "Is she really going out with him? Is she really gunna take him home tonight?" These lyrics reflect a societal truth, more or less.
This concept of "matching" attractiveness is relevant to our discussion in this post. Basically, the ugly chicks or the chicks who are only "modest" know they have little-to-no chance at ever getting with a dude of high physical attractiveness. So when they date only average people throughout their life, they look at their ugly-ass boyfriends and try to justify to themselves that they don't even like physically attractive people, or else they are failures. They also, necessarily, have to sell this falsehood to the rest of the world, making them lying butt hookers.